Read the quantity before the conclusion
Definitions, not reference ranges, diagnostic cut-offs or a personal scoring tool.
| Report item | Quantity | Not equivalent to |
|---|---|---|
| FEV1 | Volume exhaled in the first second | A flow rate or a recovery percentage |
| FVC | Volume exhaled in the forced manoeuvre | Total lung capacity |
| FEV1/FVC | Ratio of two measured volumes | Percentage of the lungs healed |
| Peak expiratory flow | Maximum expiratory flow rate | How comfortable everyday breathing feels |
‘Lung function’ is not one number
FEV1 is the volume exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration; it is not itself a flow rate. FVC is the total volume exhaled in that forced manoeuvre, not the total amount of air the lungs can contain. Peak expiratory flow is a flow rate. Even when all appear on one report, they are different quantities.
The FEV1/FVC ratio compares two measured volumes; it is not the percentage of lung damage repaired. Spirometry is one pulmonary function test. Gas-transfer testing and tests of total or residual lung volume ask other questions. None of these labels means ‘how easy breathing feels today’.
A quality grade describes the measurement, not your lungs
The 2019 ATS/ERS standard addresses equipment, trained operators and acceptable, repeatable measurements. Its test-quality grades describe confidence in the measurements achieved during that session, not a grade for lung health. A less-than-top quality grade does not automatically make the result useless; the qualified interpreter considers what can reasonably be concluded.
The 2022 ERS/ATS interpretive standard also stresses clinical context, biological variation and uncertainty. Comparing reports therefore involves more than spotting a larger number: the clinician considers the test type, quality and circumstances. Do not stop medicines, change oxygen or practise forced blowing to improve a score; follow instructions from the team arranging any test.
Bring both accounts to the same conversation
Wholly fictional example: someone says, ‘The walk from the bus stop feels easier, but my report looks similar.’ Keep the everyday observation and the report separate. A useful question is, ‘What did this test measure, and how does it relate to what I notice?’ Not ‘Which one proves I have healed?’ There is no need to repeat the walk faster or deliberately provoke breathlessness.
Describe a new or worsening breathing problem to a qualified clinician even if an earlier result was reassuring. Severe difficulty breathing, a heavy or tight chest, or sudden confusion needs emergency help. A routine quitting-support appointment is not a substitute for symptom assessment.
For quitting support in England, NHS local services offer a separate route; confirm access with the service. Keep reports and symptom details between you and your clinician. This page does not accept or interpret lung-function numbers and does not decide whether you need a test.
What to keep in mind
Sources
The central claims on this page were checked against the sources below.
- American Thoracic Society: Pulmonary Function Tests (March 2024): spirometry, diffusion and lung volumes
Sources checked: 2026-10-06
- American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society: Graham et al. (2019): Standardization of Spirometry — definitions, reported values and test quality
Sources checked: 2026-10-06
- European Respiratory Journal: Stanojevic et al. (2022): ERS/ATS interpretive strategies — published abstract
Sources checked: 2026-10-06
- NHS: Shortness of breath: assessment and urgent help
Sources checked: 2026-10-06
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Benefits of quitting: respiratory health at population level
Sources checked: 2026-10-06
- NHS: Ready to quit smoking: support in England
Sources checked: 2026-10-06
General measurement education, not interpretation of an individual report, diagnosis, test eligibility or breathing-test instruction.